Home Research Feeds The microbiome compositional and functional differences between rectal mucosa and feces

The microbiome compositional and functional differences between rectal mucosa and fecesOriginal paper

Researched by:

  • Karen Pendergrass

Last Updated: 2026-07-04

Karen Pendergrass
Karen Pendergrass

Karen Pendergrass is a microbiome researcher specializing in microbiome-targeted interventions (MBTIs). She systematically analyzes scientific literature to identify microbial patterns, develop hypotheses, and validate interventions. As the founder of the Microbiome Signatures Database, she bridges microbiome research with clinical practice. In 2012, based on her own investigative research, she became the first documented case of FMT for Celiac Disease, four years before the first published case study.

Read More
Location
China
Sample Site
Mucosa of rectum
Feces
Species
Homo sapiens

What was studied?

This study used shotgun metagenomics to compare the microbial composition and function of normal rectal mucosa against matched fecal samples. The researchers analyzed both microbial taxonomic classification and KEGG Orthology (KO) functional annotations for each sample type. They then examined how the mucosal microbiota related to host factors including age, gender, BMI, and colonic polyp risk level.

Who was studied?

The study included 20 patients with colonic polyps, each contributing a paired sample of normal rectal mucosa and feces. This matched within-person design let the researchers directly compare the two sample types from the same individuals. No further demographic breakdown is given in the abstract beyond age, gender, and BMI being used as variables of interest.

What were the most important findings?

The mucosal and fecal microbiomes were clearly distinct from one another, with the mucosal microbiome containing fewer genera overall. Burkholderia was identified as the single most discriminating genus separating feces from mucosa, indicating a notably strong mucosal presence. The team also identified novel taxonomic biomarkers linked to host factors, such as Clostridium ramosum and Enterobacter cloacae in association with age. Functionally, the mucosal microbiota was enriched for KO pathways involved in sugar transport and short-chain fatty acid metabolism.

What are the greatest implications of this study?

The findings show that fecal samples alone do not capture the distinct microbial community living at the rectal mucosal surface, a gap most gut microbiome research has overlooked. Because the mucosal niche appears compositionally and functionally distinct, with its own host-associated biomarkers and short-chain fatty acid-related activity, mucosal sampling may add diagnostic or mechanistic information that feces cannot provide. This supports incorporating mucosal microbiome analysis alongside fecal analysis in future studies of colonic polyps and related conditions.

Join the Roundtable

Contribute to published consensus reports, connect with top clinicians and researchers, and receive exclusive invitations to roundtable conferences.

Join the Waitlist and help shape the future of microbiome medicine.