Distinct alterations of gut microbiota between viral- and non-viral-related hepatocellular carcinomaOriginal paper
What was studied?
This study compared gut microbiota between viral-related and non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). It used 16S rRNA sequencing of the V3-V4 region on stool. The team also measured a fecal butyrate gene by qPCR and plasma markers of gut damage and microbial translocation. A random forest model built a diagnostic signature. The goal was to see whether cause of liver cancer leaves a distinct microbial fingerprint.
Who was studied?
The cohort was recruited in Bangkok, Thailand. It included 33 viral-HCC patients (17 hepatitis B, 16 hepatitis C) and 18 non-hepatitis B, non-hepatitis C HCC patients. Sixteen healthy adults served as controls, averaging 32.7 years. Non-viral patients were older than viral patients but similar in BMI, cirrhosis, and tumor stage. HIV-positive individuals were excluded, and antibiotics and probiotics were stopped before sampling.
What were the most important findings?
Non-viral HCC had lower alpha diversity than viral HCC (Simpson p = 0.013, Shannon p = 0.023). Sixteen genera separated the subgroups, with eleven reduced and five enriched in non-viral disease. Several short-chain fatty acid producers, including Faecalibacterium, were lower in non-viral cases. Fecal butyrate gene copies fell and plasma LBP rose in non-viral disease. The 16-genus random forest classifier reached an AUC of 0.94, with 97.0% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity.
What are the greatest implications of this study?
The results show gut dysbiosis differs by the cause of liver cancer, with non-viral disease marked by fewer short-chain fatty acid producers and more microbial translocation. A microbiota signature could help distinguish HCC subtypes noninvasively. The sample was small and single-center, and diet and environment were not fully captured. Findings are associations that need larger cohorts to confirm.