Home Research Feeds Adhesive <i>Bifidobacterium</i> Induced Changes in Cecal Microbiome Alleviated Constipation in Mice

Adhesive <i>Bifidobacterium</i> Induced Changes in Cecal Microbiome Alleviated Constipation in MiceOriginal paper

Researched by:

  • Karen Pendergrass

Last Updated: 2026-07-04

Karen Pendergrass
Karen Pendergrass

Karen Pendergrass is a microbiome researcher specializing in microbiome-targeted interventions (MBTIs). She systematically analyzes scientific literature to identify microbial patterns, develop hypotheses, and validate interventions. As the founder of the Microbiome Signatures Database, she bridges microbiome research with clinical practice. In 2012, based on her own investigative research, she became the first documented case of FMT for Celiac Disease, four years before the first published case study.

Read More
Location
China
Sample Site
Caecum
Species
Mus musculus

What was studied?

This study examined whether the adhesive properties of Bifidobacterium strains influence their ability to relieve constipation. Researchers compared a combination of multiple adhesive Bifidobacterium strains (CMB1) against a combination of multiple non-adhesive Bifidobacterium strains (CMB2). They assessed effects on stool water content, fecal short-chain fatty acids (propionate and butyrate), gastrointestinal transit time, and both fecal and cecal microbiota composition.

Who was studied?

The subjects were mice with loperamide-induced constipation, a standard pharmacological model used to mimic constipation symptoms for research purposes. The abstract does not give an exact number of animals or further details on strain, sex, or age, so no additional cohort specifics can be stated. This was an animal model study rather than a human cohort.

What were the most important findings?

CMB1, the adhesive Bifidobacterium combination, alleviated constipation more effectively than CMB2 by improving fecal water content, propionate and butyrate levels, and overall gastrointestinal transit time. In fecal microbiota, CMB1 increased relative abundances of Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Prevotella, genera associated with faster bowel movement. In cecal microbiota, CMB1 increased Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, unclassified S24-7, Dorea, Ruminococcus, Coprococcus, and Rikenella, while decreasing Oscillospira and other genera. The abstract does not mention Desulfovibrio, sulfate-reducing bacteria, hydrogen sulfide, or sulfur metabolism.

What are the greatest implications of this study?

The findings suggest that adhesion capacity is an important functional trait that can determine how effectively a probiotic strain reshapes the gut microbiome and relieves constipation. This implies that probiotic selection for constipation management should prioritize adhesive strains rather than treating all Bifidobacterium as functionally equivalent. The work also supports a mechanistic link between short-chain fatty acid production, targeted shifts in cecal and fecal microbiota, and improved gastrointestinal motility.

Join the Roundtable

Contribute to published consensus reports, connect with top clinicians and researchers, and receive exclusive invitations to roundtable conferences.

Join the Waitlist and help shape the future of microbiome medicine.